Conclusion

This example highlights the importance of working in partnership when addressing concerns relating to POPs, and of undertaking independent and appropriate exposure/ risk assessment and risk communication processes so as to provide accurate information to local communities. The example also highlighted the need for robust and representative local environmental sampling protocols to inform risk assessment models.

Sources of Literature
  • Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). A Primer on Health Risk Communication Principles and Practices.  www.atsdr.cdc.gov/HEC/primer.html. 2001. Ref Type: Report
  • 3.    Committee on Toxicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment (2001). Statement on the Tolerable Daily Intake for Dioxins and Dioxin like Polychlorinated Bi-Phenyls
  • 4.    Cox EA, Creaser CS (1995).  Determination of polychlorinated biphenyls, polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinate dibenzofurans in UK soils.  Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Pollution. Crown copyright
  • 5.    Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (2005). Memorandum of Understanding between the Health Protection Agency, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, the Department of Health, Welsh Assembly Government, the Environment Agency, the National Public Health Service for Wales and, once established, the Government Decontamination Service (GDS). DEFRA
  • 7.    Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S, Slovic P, Derby S L, Keeney R L. Acceptable Risk. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1981.
  • 10.    The Manual Reference Handbook for the Sustainable Remediation Sites Contaminated by Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs).
  • 11.    Welsh Assembly Government (2005). Chemicals in Wales Network. Compact Agreement. Welsh Assembly Government, Cardiff.